The Ups and Downs of Initial Public Offerings

Owners and partners in privately held companies view an initial public offering (IPO) as a means of achieving financial success, drawn in by massive price increases in the stocks of newly listed companies. Many businesses seek initial public offerings (IPOs) as a way to expand their financing pool and potentially make billions for their owners.

Read More: Sergey Kondratenko

But the hoped-for route to mountains of stock market wealth is paved with many a pothole, detour, and dead end. Furthermore, a lot of businesses who believe they are ready for the big stage—a Nasdaq or New York Stock Exchange IPO—may not be at all.

An initial public offering, or “going public,” is a useful tool for businesses looking to raise capital. However, the benefits and drawbacks of this decision must be thoroughly considered before making the intricate, costly, and time-consuming preparations and assuming the associated risks.

The Benefits of Being Known

The firm may be able to expand without incurring interest payments by using the cash inflow from the sale of stock to finance its operations. Spending this “free” money on expansion projects may improve profitability.

In order to grow the company and increase profitability, new funds may be allocated to marketing and advertising, hiring more seasoned employees who will need to take on larger salary requirements, researching and developing new goods and/or services, building new facilities or renovating existing ones, and dozens of other initiatives.

More remuneration may be made available to investors, stakeholders, partners, senior management, founders and owners, and staff members participating in equity ownership schemes as the company’s finances improve.

One useful incentive scheme is the usage of company shares and stock options. Stock options are a desirable incentive for luring in outstanding senior managers. A performance-based stock or option bonus scheme is a good way to boost employee productivity and improve management success. Options and stocks can be utilized for additional types of remuneration.

Extra shares can be simply sold to raise money once the firm becomes public. When extra cash is needed, a publicly listed firm with well-performing stock will typically be able to borrow money more easily and at a more favorable rate.

Views Regarding Public Firms

Additionally, a publicly traded firm could be more appealing to buyers and have greater negotiating power with suppliers. This is an important part of running a business, and a company with lower vendor expenses might have higher profit margins. Another benefit publicly traded firms have over privately owned ones is that their customers often view them more favorably. This is mostly because public corporations are subject to routine audits and close examination of their financial statements.

If business is doing well, a publicly listed firm projects a favorable image and draws top talent to all levels, including senior management. These businesses focus on expansion, have a board of directors and shareholders that constantly demand more profitability, and act quickly to replace underperforming top executives and address management issues.

The Consequences of Making Public

When a corporation becomes public, the public and government may scrutinize its finances and nearly every aspect of it, including its commercial activities. There are yearly and quarterly reporting requirements, as well as periodic audits. Public access to a firm’s finances and other business data can occasionally be detrimental to the interests of the company. These reports, which might not be viewed favorably, can properly reveal a company’s cash flow and creditworthiness with careful study.

SEC monitoring and regulations, including stringent disclosure requirements, apply to the corporation. Information on top management individuals, including salary, is one of the mandatory disclosures. Stakeholders frequently object to this information.

Whether or whether they are justified, shareholders may file lawsuits against the corporation. Claims of insider trading or self-trading may serve as the basis for lawsuits. They could contest executive pay or raise concerns about important management choices. For a publicly traded company, a single, irate shareholder filing a lawsuit may be costly and time-consuming.

Important Public Firm Challenges

The IPO preparation process is costly, intricate, and time-consuming. It is necessary to have accountants, investment bankers, and lawyers on staff. External advisors are also sometimes needed. Preparing for an IPO may take up to a year. During this period, business and market conditions might drastically shift, and it might no longer be a favorable moment for an IPO, making the preparation work and associated costs pointless.

For the senior management team, achieving profitability every quarter is a challenging task. A stock price decrease is typically the outcome of missing targets or projections. Furthermore, declining stock prices encourage further dumping, which reduces the value of the stocks even more.

In order to prevent selloffs at the outset, a no-sell period is sometimes imposed before purchasers and original holders of the IPO shares may liquidate their positions. A loss might occur if the stock price drops during this time. Furthermore, throughout this time, market and business conditions might alter negatively impacting the stock price.

The Final Word

An initial public offering (IPO) may appear to be the ideal way to make money from a distance. The numerous problems show clearly up close. But none of them should deter a business from going public. If all the factors are in place and the benefits and drawbacks have been thoroughly considered, along with any associated risks, an initial public offering (IPO) might be a lucrative avenue for a business that is prepared for public trading.

However, IPOs may not always result in financial success for businesses and/or investors. Some businesses have been extremely let down by IPO price performance. Lastly, for firms that are already listed on a public exchange, the reverse move—taking a public business private—may ultimately turn out to be more advantageous than an IPO.